ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026
Computed tomography-based deep learning prediction of radiation-induced functional decline after lung cancer radiotherapy.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiation therapy is a key treatment modality for lung cancer; however, post-treatment pulmonary function decline remains a clinically significant concern. Conventional dose-volume parameters provide limited individualized prediction of functional deterioration and fail to account for the heterogeneous baseline lung status visible on computed tomography (CT). In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model to predict post-radiation pulmonary function and identify patients transitioning to a high-risk functional state [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio, FEV1/FVC <70%] using pre-treatment chest CT and clinical variables. Methods: In this retrospective, single-institution study, the data of 276 patients with stage I-II lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy and had available pre- and post-treatment spirometry results were analyzed. A pretrained three-dimensional (3D) ResNet-18 architecture was used to extract imaging features from pre-treatment CT scans, which were integrated with clinical variables including age, sex, baseline pulmonary function, and radiation dose parameters. A focal-weighted loss strategy was incorporated to address the class imbalance. The model performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation and ensemble prediction. Results: The ensemble model achieved a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.65 for FVC, 0.72 for FEV1, and 0.83 for FEV1/FVC. For classification of high-risk functional decline (post-treatment FEV1/FVC <70%) among patients with normal baseline function, the model achieved an accuracy of 78.1%, a sensitivity of 54.5%, a specificity of 83.0%, and an area under the curve of 0.802. Among the patients with normal baseline pulmonary function, 17.1% transitioned to the high-risk group after treatment. Conclusions: Deep learning using pre-treatment CT can predict radiation-induced functional decline and provide high-confidence risk stratification. By identifying patients who are susceptible to clinically significant pulmonary functional deterioration before treatment, this approach enables individualized adaptive planning and early preventive interventions, thereby advancing precision radiation oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.