ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2026
A narrative review on CT-based evaluation and prediction of lung nodule growth: current status and future directions.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Lung cancer ranks as the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide and the leading cause of cancer deaths. Pulmonary nodule growth serves as critical information for determining the probability of malignancy and guiding clinical decisions regarding surgical intervention and follow-up strategies. This review synthesizes current evidence on the multidimensional evaluation criteria for pulmonary nodule growth and the advancements in computed tomography (CT)-derived imaging prediction models, aiming to inform and optimize the clinical management of pulmonary nodules. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across the Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. The search strategy was designed to identify articles addressing pulmonary nodule growth and CT imaging features. The search was limited to original research articles and meta-analyses published in English between January 1, 2020 and February 3, 2026. Key Content and Findings: Current guidelines still exhibit subtle differences in defining pulmonary nodule growth, with the most commonly adopted criteria in contemporary research including an increase in mean diameter of 1.5 or 2 mm, a 25% volumetric increase, or a volume doubling time (VDT) of less than 400 days. In this context, CT imaging provides critical information associated with pulmonary nodule growth, such as nodule size, density, tumor characteristics, and peritumoral signs. Meanwhile, with the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), radiomics approaches have further improved the accuracy of pulmonary nodule growth prediction, while deep learning has enabled the visualization of future nodule imaging. Additionally, natural language processing (NLP) models, as a rapidly developing technology, have exhibited considerable promise in predicting nodule growth and enhancing the efficiency of follow-up management protocols. Conclusions: This article provides a systematic overview of the evolution of assessment methods for pulmonary nodule growth and the latest breakthroughs in predictive modeling, and offers perspectives on future directions in this domain. With the continuous empowerment of AI in pulmonary nodule growth management, the corresponding clinical pathway stands to benefit from increasingly systematic optimization and evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.