ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Efficacy and predictors of cognitive stimulation therapy combined with pharmacotherapy for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive Stimulation and Training in People with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with progressive cognitive decline, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. Although pharmacological treatments such as cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are commonly used, their clinical benefits remain limited and heterogeneous. Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) may provide additional benefits when combined with standard pharmacotherapy. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of modified CST combined with standard drug therapy on cognitive function, activities of daily living, and quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate AD and to explore key predictors of CST efficacy using a multivariate regression model. Methods: This evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial enrolled 80 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the modified CST plus standard pharmacotherapy group (study group, n = 40) or the standard pharmacotherapy-alone group (control group, n = 40).The modified CST program comprised 14 weekly 45-minute sessions. The primary endpoint was the change in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) score from baseline to post-intervention. Secondary measures included the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale and the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's disease (QOL-AD) questionnaire. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach. Independent predictors of treatment efficacy were identified using a two-stage screening strategy (univariate screening and stepwise regression). Results: A total of 75 patients completed the study, and 80 were included in the ITT analysis. After 14 weeks of intervention, baseline-adjusted ANCOVA showed that the study group had significantly better post-intervention ADAS-Cog scores than the control group. The adjusted mean difference in ADAS-Cog score was -3.28 points (95% CI: -3.72 to -2.83; P < 0.001), favoring the study group. Significant baseline-adjusted between-group differences were also observed for ADL (adjusted mean difference = -4.93, 95% CI: -8.39 to -1.47; P = 0.006) and QOL-AD (adjusted mean difference = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.37; P = 0.002), both favoring the study group. Higher years of education (β = -0.54, P < 0.001), regular physical activity (β = -0.28, P = 0.003), higher baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (β = -0.22, P = 0.001), and active hobbies (β = -0.20, P = 0.002) were significant independent predictors of CST efficacy. Discussion: Modified CST combined with medication significantly delays cognitive decline and improves QOL-AD in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Educational attainment, lifestyle factors, and cognitive reserve are key determinants of CST efficacy. Relevant institutions should develop targeted enhancement protocols for patients with lower educational levels or insufficient cognitive reserves when implementing CST. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier ChiCTR2600118654, https://www.chictr.org.cn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.