ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Bayesian Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Under Correlated and Uncorrelated Pleiotropy Using GWAS Summary Statistics.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instruments to study causal relationships between traits. Standard unidirectional MR approaches are vulnerable to pleiotropy and typically assume that pleiotropic effects are independent of instrument strength, assumptions that may fail when causation operates in both directions. We propose BayBiMR, a Bayesian bidirectional MR framework that jointly estimates causal effects in both directions while modeling both correlated and uncorrelated pleiotropy through a hierarchical spike-and-slab prior on pleiotropic effects and an Inverse-Wishart prior on the joint covariance of direct and pleiotropic SNP effects. The likelihood is based on a small-feedback reduced-form approximation to the underlying simultaneous-equation model, which preserves conjugacy and enables efficient closed-form posterior computation. Posterior inference is carried out via a blocked Gibbs sampler, and a data-perturbation extension, BayBiMR(DP), is provided to improve empirical frequentist calibration in finite samples. Simulation studies show that BayBiMR and BayBiMR(DP) provide better type I error control than existing methods in the settings considered, particularly under correlated and mixed pleiotropy. Applications to large-scale GWAS summary statistics on white-matter (WM) microstructures, BMI, sleep duration, and neuroticism illustrate the method's practical utility as an exploratory and sensitivity tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.