ArticleBritish journal of haematology2026
Leukaemic stem cell burden enhances prognostic precision in the non-adverse European LeukemiaNet risk group of acute myeloid leukaemia.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leukaemic stem cell burden enhances prognostic precision in the non-adverse European LeukemiaNet risk group of acute myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leukaemic stem cells (LSCs) are chemo-resistant leukaemia-initiating clones that drive refractoriness and relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). The study evaluated the prognostic significance of LSC burden in treatment naïve AML patients. LSCs were quantified using Next-generation flow cytometry; patients were stratified into LSC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.