ArticleAnaesthesia and intensive care2026
During pregnancy, anticoagulant effect of low molecular weight heparin can be determined with both thrombelastography and anti-factor Xa activity, or not?
Article in Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism is a common cause of maternal mortality. Many women need regional anaesthesia during vaginal delivery or caesarean section. However, the risk of epidural or spinal haematoma is increased if regional anaesthesia is administered during ongoing thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The aims of this pilot study are to evaluate the anticoagulant effect of LMWH during pregnancy by thrombelastography and anti-factor Xa (FXa) activity and their correlations. Sixteen pregnant women were administered dalteparin or tinzaparin from early pregnancy until six weeks postpartum. The anticoagulant effect was determined immediately before and three hours after injection. The target anti-FXa activity was 0.1-0.2 IU/ml pre-injection and less than 0.45 IU/ml post-injection. Thrombelastography variables were assessed at the same time. The correlations between anti-FXa activity and thrombelastography variables were modest, with correlation coefficients at 0.4-0.5. The thrombelastography variable best correlated to anti-FXa activity <0.1 IU/ml was thrombelastography K. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for thrombelastography K against anti-FXa activity <0.1 IU/ml was 0.77 (95% confidence intervals 0.64 to 0.91) with sensitivity 0.76 and specificity 0.81. The correlations increased as pregnancy progressed. The anticoagulant effect of LMWH can be measured either by analysis of anti-FXa activity or with thrombelastography. However, the correlation between the two methods is too low to allow replacement of one by the other. Further studies are necessary to determine which of the methods best predicts anticoagulant effect and increased risk of bleeding complications related to delivery or regional anaesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.