ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2026
'…but look how many lives would have been saved if this was available then' Exploring the acceptability of future Human Papillomavirus self-sampling, and the barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening for those with intellectual disabilities in Scotland.
Article in British journal of health psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer screening attendance among women with intellectual disabilities (ID) in Scotland is approximately 30%, significantly below the general population rate of 69% and the WHO's recommended 70% target. HPV self-sampling could provide a more accessible screening option for this underserved population. This study aimed to understand the views and experiences of women with ID regarding cervical cancer screening and the acceptability of HPV self-sampling.
methodsA qualitative study using focus groups was conducted with women with ID who attended third-sector community groups across Scotland, along with their carers. Four focus groups were held between September and October 2024, with a total of 13 participants (11 women with ID, 2 carers). Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsFive main themes emerged: (1) National Health Service (NHS) communication as a source of distress; (2) power imbalances between health care providers and women with ID: feeling unheard, dismissed and out of control; (3) enduring consequences of inadequate care; (4) past trauma shapes future avoidance; and (5) self-sampling as a pathway to empowerment. Participants demonstrated high acceptability of self-sampling, viewing it as a potential solution to overcome barriers to traditional screening.
conclusionThis research reveals significant systemic inadequacies in current cervical cancer screening services for women with ID, whilst highlighting self-sampling's transformative potential. Successful implementation requires comprehensive accessible information, enhanced health care professional training and trauma-informed care approaches. Self-sampling could significantly advance health equity goals whilst improving health care outcomes for this underserved population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.