Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432790›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychology2026

Evaluation of the effectiveness of Reframe-IT + to prevent suicidal ideation and other mental health outcomes among adolescents in Chile: 3-month, 6-month and 10-month follow-up.

Jorge Gaete, Daniela Meza, Jo Robinson, Daniel Núñez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05229302 (Testing the Effectiveness of a CBT Online-based Program to Reduce Suicide Ideation Among School Adolescents in Chile), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05229302 nacompletednot on this map

Testing the Effectiveness of a CBT Online-based Program to Reduce Suicide Ideation Among School Adolescents in Chile: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TalcaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled240ConditionsSuicidal IdeationArmsReframet IT, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorge GaeteUniversidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6650-6018
Daniela MezaDoctoral Program in Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Population Health, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0854-9763
Jo Robinson, ParkvilleMelbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-918X
Daniel NúñezFaculty of Psychology, Universidad de Talca, Avenida Lircay S/N, Talca, Chile. dnunez@utalca.cl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-2249

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Fondecyt regular 1250325ANID/FONDECYT REGULAR 1261819Center for the Well-Being and Development of Adolescents and Children in the Digital Age (BAND) CIN250046National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant APP2008460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchools are suitable settings to prevent suicide among adolescents. We tested the effectiveness of a school-based program to reduce suicidal ideation (SI) (Reframe-IT +). It encompasses 13 sessions (eight internet-based and five face-to-face sessions).

methodsWe conducted a cluster RCT among students aged 13-18. Twenty-one schools were randomized (Intervention Group (IG), N = 47); Control Group (CG), N = 48)). The primary outcome was SI. Secondary outcomes were depressive and anxiety symptoms, psychotic experiences, hopelessness, and emotion regulation strategies (cognitive reappraisal, and emotion suppression), problem-solving skills and behavioral activation. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, 3-month, 6-month, and 10-month follow-up).

trial registrationClinical Trials NCT05229302. Registered on Registered on February 8, 2022.

resultsWe found a non-significant overall intervention effect on SI across follow-up assessments, but significant overall intervention effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms and psychotic experiences. Moreover, we found time-specific reductions immediately after the intervention and close to it, particularly for depressive and anxiety symptoms, hopelessness, behavioral activation and cognitive re-appraisal. The change favoring the IG of cognitive re- appraisal was also significant at 10 months follow-up.

conclusionsOur results suggest that Reframe-IT + reduces depressive and anxiety symptoms and psychotic experiences in the long term. Less promising results were related to suicidal ideation prevention. Further research is needed with a larger sample size.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationAdolescentAnxietyChileDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleAdolescentsReframe-IT + blended interventionSchoolsSuicide ideation

Identifiers

PMID42432790
PMCPMC13640232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.