Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432778›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery & related research2026

Knee-specific bone quality assessment for cementless total knee arthroplasty candidate selection: a narrative review.

Dong Hwan Lee, Dai-Soon Kwak, Sheen-Woo Lee, Sung-Min Kim, Yong Deok Kim, In Jun Koh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery & related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong Hwan LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, 07345, Republic of Korea.
Dai-Soon KwakDepartment of Anatomy, Catholic Institute for Applied Anatomy, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
Sheen-Woo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Min KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, 07345, Republic of Korea.
Yong Deok KimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.
In Jun KohDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea. esmh.jrcenter@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has regained attention in younger, active, and obese patients, supported by advances in implant design, porous coating, and 3D printing technologies. However, the success of cementless fixation depends on adequate initial mechanical stability and subsequent osseointegration, making the assessment of bone quality at the implant-bone interface essential. Although central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is useful for evaluating systemic bone health, it has been reported to inadequately reflect the localized peripheral bone quality of the distal femur and proximal tibia. Therefore, cementless TKA candidate selection requires direct evaluation of the bone quality around the knee joint, particularly at the bone resection site. This narrative review summarizes the preoperative and intraoperative methods available for knee-specific bone quality assessment in the context of cementless TKA selection. Various X-ray-based methods are accessible but limited by two-dimensional projection and protocol variability. Peripheral DXA allows localized bone mineral density measurement but lacks standardization and remains two-dimensional. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has potential for assessing marrow composition and trabecular microarchitecture, but evidence supporting its use in cementless TKA selection remains limited. By contrast, computed tomography (CT)-based assessment is considered the most practical modality, offering three-dimensional evaluation and region-specific analysis. Hounsfield unit analysis on conventional CT can be readily integrated into the routine preoperative workflow, while quantitative CT and dual-energy CT provide more quantitative evaluation through volumetric bone mineral density measurement. Intraoperative assessment has the advantage of directly evaluating the implant bed; however, conventional tactile assessment remains subjective, and visual grading systems and device-based assessments have been proposed to overcome this limitation. Nevertheless, no standardized method has yet been established, and further research is needed. CT-based assessment is the most practical current modality, and intraoperative assessment is gaining objectivity. The integration of these methods with artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal assessment is expected to enable more precise and patient-specific cementless TKA candidate selection.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, replacement, kneeBone densityCementlessMonitoring, intraoperativePeripheral bone qualityTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID42432778
PMCPMC13355351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.