SynthesisSystematic reviews2026
Grading the evidence for CPET variables in predicting perioperative morbidity and long-term mortality in lung cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCurrent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) guidelines for lung cancer surgery rely on expert consensus and scientific statements, lacking robust, graded evidence. This study aimed to provide an evidence-based evaluation of CPET variables for assessing perioperative morbidity and long-term mortality risks.
methodsElectronic databases were searched through December 20, 2025, for cohort studies on CPET variables and lung cancer surgery. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the Q-test and I
resultsOf 3080 studies, 47 studies involving 11,356 surgeries and 13 CPET variables were included. Meta-analysis and GRADE assessment showed lower peak oxygen uptake (peak
conclusionAmong 13 CPET variables, only peak SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023405083.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.