ArticleBMC psychology2026
The power of silence: a qualitative inquiry into silent consent and its psychosocial foundations.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to understand why individuals remain silent in the face of social deviance phenomena such as injustice, discrimination, violence, corruption, and lawlessness in everyday life, and how repeated and normalized silence may contribute to the social production of consent. Using a qualitative focus group design, semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with 30 participants from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds. The data were analysed through a codebook-oriented thematic analysis informed by Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach. The analysis generated three main themes: Learned Silence, Learned Helplessness, and Avoidance. The findings show that silence should not be interpreted automatically as approval. In participants' accounts, silence was often associated with fear, shame, emotional exhaustion, avoidance of harm, distrust of institutions, social exclusion, and self-protection. However, when individual silences are repeatedly observed, socially normalized, and institutionally ignored or exploited, they may contribute to the normalization and reproduction of the very deviance that individuals do not explicitly approve. The study therefore develops the concept of societal silent consent as a collective process through which repeated individual silences in the face of perceived social deviance contribute to the normalization, legitimation, or reproduction of that deviance. By distinguishing silence as behaviour from silent consent as a possible social effect, the study extends discussions of silence beyond organizational behaviour and situates them within everyday social relations, cultural expectations, and structural power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.