ArticleNutrition & metabolism2026
Dietary patterns and exploratory gut microbiota profiles associated with diabetic retinopathy and cognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes.
Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) and cognitive impairment are closely related complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although dietary patterns and gut microbiota have each been linked to these conditions, their combined associations with co-occurring DR and cognitive impairment remain unclear. This study examined dietary patterns and exploratory gut microbiota profiles in relation to co-occurring DR and cognitive impairment in patients with T2DM.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 306 patients with T2DM were classified into four groups: no DR with normal cognition (DMCN), no DR with cognitive impairment (DMCI), DR with normal cognition (DRCN), and DR with cognitive impairment (DRCI). Dietary patterns were derived using principal component analysis. Gut microbiota composition was assessed using 16 S rRNA sequencing in a subset of 108 participants. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations between dietary patterns and group classification, and microbiome analyses included diversity, taxonomic composition, exploratory differential abundance, and diet-microbiota correlations.
resultsFour dietary patterns were identified. In fully adjusted models, DP-I and DP-II were associated with higher odds of DMCI and DRCI, respectively, whereas DP-III was associated with lower odds of both DMCI and DRCN. DP-IV showed no significant association. Gut microbiota analyses showed modest but statistically significant group-related differences in community structure, with partial overlap across groups. Exploratory LEfSe analysis identified group-associated taxa, including higher relative abundances of Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, and Dubosiella in DMCN and of Pseudomonas, Bilophila, and Sarcina in DRCI. However, these genus-level differences were not significant after covariate-adjusted MaAsLin2 analysis with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Nominal diet-microbiota correlations were observed but were not statistically robust after FDR correction.
conclusionDietary patterns were associated with clinical group classification based on DR and cognitive impairment in patients with T2DM. Gut microbiota analyses suggested modest, exploratory group-related differences, but diet-microbiota correlations were not statistically robust after FDR correction. These cross-sectional findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.