ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Exploration-based feedback for BCI training: a case study with an adolescent with paraplegia.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBrain-computer interface (BCI) inefficiency limits clinical utilization of BCIs, as many users struggle to produce consistent machine-recognizable electroencephalography (EEG) patterns for reliable control. While training can improve BCI performance for most users, the required duration and intensity may hinder BCI accessibility. Prior BCI and motor learning research suggests that feedback enabling efficient exploration of different task strategies may enhance training.
methodsAn eight-session BCI training case study was completed with an adolescent participant with paraplegia. To support training, a novel feedback system that visualized EEG signal pattern states identified via K-means clustering within the EEG covariance space. Unlike common classifier feedback, this interface presented the EEG signal patterns produced throughout each trial, allowing the participant to explore strategies that yielded task-specific pattern states.
resultsThe participant was initially a low-performing user and showed little progress across the first five sessions. After transitioning to a simplified feedback mode emphasizing deviation from resting state patterns in the sixth session, the participant displayed significant improvement in task-related physiological signal discriminability. Post-training analysis, however, revealed that this improvement was partially attributable to electromyography (EMG) activity from cranial muscles.
conclusionAlthough the observed gains were not solely attributable to neuro-cortical signal modulation, the case study highlights the potential of simplified feedback to support task exploration in low-performing users and presents potential implications for hybrid EEG-EMG BCIs for relevant clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.