ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026
Prediction model for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in microwave ablation of thyroid nodules.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop an explainable machine learning (ML) framework integrating clinical, imaging, and procedural features for predicting recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury risk during microwave ablation (MWA) of thyroid nodules.
methodsA retrospective study is conducted using data from 254 patients who underwent thyroid nodule MWA. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) with 5 × fivefold cross-validation selected 12 optimal features across four ML models: logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). Model performance is evaluated via AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provides interpretability by quantifying feature contributions.
resultsThe RandomForest model achieved the highest discriminative performance (AUC = 0.9755 ± 0.0242, accuracy = 0.9729 ± 0.0155) and calibration (Brier score = 0.038). Key predictors included nodule volume, ablation time, and proximity to the tracheoesophageal groove. SHAP analysis revealed model-specific interactions: nodule orientation (SVM) and post-ablation dimensions (RF) significantly influenced risk. DCA confirmed clinical utility, with RF providing the highest net benefit across thresholds (0.2-0.6). Laboratory markers and echogenicity demonstrated cross-model consistency, underscoring their biological relevance.
conclusionThis study establishes the first interpretable ML framework for RLN injury prediction in thyroid nodule MWA, highlighting the superiority of ensemble learning and clinical-imaging integration. Future validation in diverse cohorts and real-time integration into ablation systems may enhance procedural safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.