ArticleBMC health services research2026
Key factors influencing patient satisfaction in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality and an essential measure of emergency department (ED) performance. In high-demand ED environments, satisfaction reflects not only clinical outcomes, but also communication, waiting time, clarity of processes, and the overall patient experience. The aim of this study was to identify clinical and non-clinical factors that influence patient satisfaction in the ED of a tertiary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis analytical cross-sectional study included Arabic or English speaking adult patients (≥ 18 years) attending the ED of a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia after triage and clinical stabilization. Patients triaged as levels I-II, arriving by ambulance, medically unstable, or having impaired cognitive or mental status were excluded. The target sample size was estimated using a 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error, and 50% response distribution, which yielded an approximate target range of 280-380 participants for a large ED population; 298 complete questionnaires were included. A structured questionnaire covering demographics, 21 satisfaction factors, and three global satisfaction items was administered. Descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and multivariable linear regression were used; significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 298 patients were included, and the response rate was 75.06% of eligible participants (298/397). Most participants reported generally positive experiences across satisfaction domains. Nearly all factors showed significant positive correlations with overall satisfaction, and the strongest associations were observed for communication with physicians (ρ = 0.46), communication with nurses (ρ = 0.40), explanation of the treatment provided (ρ = 0.38), and waiting time during stay (ρ = 0.41). In the multivariable model (R² = 0.50), four factors remained significant predictors: communication with physicians, communication with nurses, explanation of the treatment provided, and waiting time during stay. Environmental and facility-related factors were less influential after adjustment.
conclusionsCommunication and timely care play central roles in shaping patient satisfaction in the ED. These findings highlight the value of improving communication skills among healthcare providers and workflow processes to reduce waiting times. Future studies should incorporate length of stay and examine how different clinical presentations influence satisfaction within the ED environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.