Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432642›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2026

Computational forecasting using Swedish data in the vaccination phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review deliberating modelling relevance for public health and healthcare.

Anna Saxne Jöud, Henrik Thorén, Armin Spreco, Torbjörn Lundh, Toomas Timpka, Philip Gerlee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna Saxne JöudDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik ThorénDepartment of Philosophy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Armin SprecoDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Torbjörn LundhMathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Toomas TimpkaDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Philip GerleeMathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. gerlee@chalmers.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-0177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of computational forecasting in the later phase of the COVID-19 pandemic when vaccines and clinical pharmaceutical interventions were available have seldom been assessed. We aimed to evaluate computational forecasting research applied to Swedish populations in the vaccination phase of the pandemic.

methodsA systematic search was performed on March 8, 2024 in the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, Embase, Love platform and Epistemikos. An updated version of the Risk of bias Opinion Tool (ROBOT) was used to assess the quality of evidence reported in the papers identified in the search. The articles fulfilling the quality criteria were assessed for suitability for meta-analysis. Data were extracted from the selected articles for synthesis of characteristics, and a thematic analysis was used for a qualitative synthesis of the contents.

resultsOf 2034 unique publications identified in the database search, 6 articles satisfied the selection and quality criteria. Variability in the reporting of forecasting performance results was found to make a quantitative meta-analysis of forecast performance infeasible. The data synthesis showed that statistical modeling using Bayesian calibration was the most common methodological approach. No external model validation was reported, but 5/6 articles included internal model corroboration data. The primary theme resulting from the qualitative synthesis of article content was design or refinement of computational models with demonstration of model use in health service practice as a secondary theme. None of the articles referred to health service policymaking as the primary research context.

conclusionComputational forecasting research using Swedish population data from the vaccination phase of the COVID-19 pandemic was deployed in a model design context. While methodological knowledge was developed, most of the research was not initiated to solve the public health and healthcare problems at hand. Our results indicate that the alignment between computational forecasting research and policymaking needs in the vaccination phase of pandemics can be enhanced.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPublic HealthVaccinationForecastingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SwedenCOVID-19 VaccinesBiostatisticsComputational modelingCOVID-19 pandemicDecision supportHealth informaticsHealth policiesModelsPreventive health services

Identifiers

PMID42432642
PMCPMC13356788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.