ArticleBMC women's health2026
Integrating epigenetic and metabolic indicators for non-invasive endometrial cancer triage: a machine learning approach.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAbnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a primary symptom indicative of endometrial cancer (EC), yet its diagnosis still primarily relies on invasive biopsy. This study aimed to develop and validate a non-invasive, interpretable machine learning (ML) model integrating local epigenetic (exfoliated cell CDO1 methylation) and systemic metabolic indicators for EC triage.
methodsCDO1 was identified as a potential biomarker via bioinformatics. Its diagnostic performance was assessed using quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP) in a clinical cohort of 267 women with AUB. Subsequently, a multimodal ML framework was developed that incorporated logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms to integrate methylation data with clinical metabolic profiles. Model interpretability was ensured by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis, with final testing in an internal holdout cohort.
resultsCDO1 hypermethylation was identified as a significant epigenetic alteration associated with metabolic pathways in EC. Within our clinical cohort, CDO1 methylation emerged as a strong independent risk factor, with an odds ratio (OR) of 12.76 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 6.31 to 25.80. Using LASSO regression, four critical predictive variables were identified: CDO1 methylation, menopausal status, diabetes and age. After integrating CDO1 methylation and metabolic profiles, the support vector machine model demonstrated stable performance in the validation set, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI: 0.669-0.880), with a sensitivity of 0.800 and a specificity of 0.733. SHAP analysis was used to elucidate the contribution of each feature to the predictive model. The finalized SVM-based model's diagnostic utility was further confirmed in an internal holdout cohort, yielding an AUC of 0.904 (95% CI: 0.838-0.969), with a sensitivity of 0.833 and a specificity of 0.905, demonstrating its preliminary clinical reliability. Using our model with a cutoff of 0.647 in the internal holdout cohort (n = 160), 24 patients were triaged for biopsy, with 2 EC cases missed, representing a clinical false-negative rate of 16.7%. The finalized SVM-based predictive model was developed into a free online risk calculator ( https://phw1996.shinyapps.io/EC_risk/ ) for real-time clinical triage.
conclusionsOur SVM-based model offers a non-invasive and highly specific approach for the triage of patients experiencing AUB. By correlating localized molecular changes with systemic metabolic dysregulation, this tool supports personalized risk stratification and clinical triage. It is designed for relative risk stratification, and external recalibration is required for clinical absolute risk estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.