ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2026
Factors influencing the optimal glycemic levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients attending the diabetic clinic of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi.
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptimal glycaemic control is essential for preventing complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet a large proportion of patients fail to achieve recommended glycaemic targets even in tertiary care settings. Identifying independent behavioural and treatment-related determinants of glycaemic control is crucial for improving diabetes management.
methodsA hospital-based analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 416 adult patients with T2DM attending the diabetic outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Data were collected using a structured, pre-tested questionnaire covering sociodemographic profile, lifestyle practices, treatment adherence, and healthcare access. Glycaemic control was assessed using HbA1c values and categorized as optimal (< 7%) and poor (≥ 7%). Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Spearman correlation, and multivariable logistic regression were applied using IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac (Version 31.0).
resultsOptimal glycaemic control was observed in 239 (57.5%) participants, while 177 (42.5%) had poor control. Higher physical activity, adherence to a diabetic diet, and consistent medication adherence were significantly associated with optimal glycaemic control in bivariate analysis (p < 0.05). Spearman correlation showed a strong positive correlation between medication adherence and glycaemic control, followed by physical activity and regular follow-up. In multivariable regression analysis, medication adherence, physical activity, and regular follow-up emerged as significant independent predictors of optimal glycaemic control, whereas sociodemographic factors showed weaker adjusted effects.
conclusionGlycaemic control among patients with T2DM is predominantly influenced by modifiable behavioural and treatment-related factors. Strengthening medication adherence counselling, lifestyle modification, and structured follow-up within tertiary care diabetes clinics may substantially improve glycaemic outcomes and reduce the long-term burden of diabetes-related complications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.