Observational studyBMC public health2026
Adaptation in emergent adulthood for persons with prior experience in residential youth care in Norway: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe adversities experienced by youth placed in Residential Youth Care (RYC) challenge their development through adolescence and into adulthood. Yet, we know little about how they adapt during the transition into emergent adulthood. Here, we examine their socioeconomic and civil status and psychosocial functioning, how they compare with peers, and whether there are systematic variations across sex and age.
methodsTen years after the initial assessment of 400 12-20-year-olds residing in RYC in Norway, we conducted a follow-up assessment when they were ages 22-30, enrolling 157 (52% response rate). Participants completed an online survey where socioeconomic and civil status were measured with multiple-choice items. Psychosocial functioning in terms of social relationships, perceived social support, and self-perception was measured with standard psychometric scales and quality of life (QOL) with two commonly used ratings. Trained professionals rated global psychosocial functioning on a standard scale based on completion of a semi-structured psychiatric interview. Descriptive statistics were used to inform about the adaptation in these targeted areas. Sex differences were tested with Chi
resultsCompared to those in the general population, young adults with prior experience with RYC attained lower education, employment, and income. They became parents more often and at an earlier age. They also reported on average lower global self-worth and QOL, and for the majority their global psychosocial functioning was rated as in need of clinical services. However, the quantity and quality of their social relationships were reported similar to peers. Sex differences were few, other than females were more likely to be in intimate relationships and have a child. Adaptation was not better for older participants in the sample age range.
conclusionsAddressing the elementary question, "How are these vulnerable individuals doing in general in emergent adulthood?" results imply that the answer is "Not so good." Social services need to consider how to improve interventions during childhood as well as in the transition when this group ages out of RYC to mitigate these negative long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.