Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432605›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2026

Living environments and mental symptoms and disorders.

Yingying Xie, Jiawei Liu, Jiayuan Xu, Feng Liu, Meng Liang, Wen Qin, Chunshui Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingying Xie *Department of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging and State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Jiawei Liu *Department of Neurology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, 518033, China.
Jiayuan XuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging and State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging and State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Meng LiangSchool of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Wen QinDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging and State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Chunshui YuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging and State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China. chunshuiyu@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5648-5199

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82430063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe live in different environments with distinct effects on mental health. However, the complex associations between living environments and mental symptoms and disorders remain elusive. This study aimed to comprehensively investigate how multiple environmental factors relate to mental symptoms and predict the onset of psychiatric disorders.

methodsUsing data from the UK Biobank, we systematically characterized ten living environmental exposures, encompassing both built and natural environment features. We comprehensively examined their associations with symptoms of anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder, evaluating not only the overall effects but also stratified effects across sex and age subgroups to capture potential demographic-specific vulnerabilities. Furthermore, we investigated the predictive value of these baseline environmental exposures for the subsequent onset of eight major psychiatric disorders over time. To enhance precision, all analyses were complemented by subgroup-specific models, allowing us to identify both shared and distinct patterns of environmental influence across demographic strata.

resultsWe identified 18 significant associations between environmental exposures and baseline mental symptoms, with area deprivation showing the most significant associations with depression and anxiety symptoms. Destination accessibility and slope emerged as novel protective factors, while area deprivation and air pollution accounted for more than 80% of the environmental contribution to model explanatory power. One sex-specific and three age-specific associations were observed, particularly for street network accessibility and area deprivation. Longitudinal analyses identified 25 significant associations between environmental predictors and incident mental disorders, involving eight environmental factors across eight disorders. Specially, destination accessibility was associated with a 56.6% reduced risk of schizophrenia. Two sex-specific and four age-specific predictions were also found.

conclusionsThis study uncovers previously unrecognized potential environmental factors associated with mental health outcomes and highlights distinct vulnerability patterns across demographic groups. By elucidating these nuanced associations, our findings offer a foundation for precision public health initiatives and underscore the potential of evidence-informed urban and environmental planning to mitigate mental health risks at the population level. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureMental DisordersResidence CharacteristicsAdultAgedAnxiety DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUK BiobankUnited KingdomAge-related heterogeneityEnvironmental exposuresMental health outcomesPsychiatric symptomatologySex-dependent effects

Identifiers

PMID42432605
PMCPMC13681815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.