Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432604›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2026

Geometric simplification by ductal unification of dual pancreatic ducts during pancreaticojejunostomy.

Shinnosuke Harata, Yoichi Matsuo, Naoi Sato, Haruka Shigemori, Akitoshi Okuyama, Seiya Yamamoto, Ryo Nakajima, Masayuki Komura, Kaori Watanabe, Naruomi Jinno and 9 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shinnosuke HarataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Yoichi MatsuoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan. matsuo@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.
Naoi SatoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Haruka ShigemoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Akitoshi OkuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Seiya YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Ryo NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Masayuki KomuraDepartment of Pathology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Kaori WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Naruomi JinnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Yushi YamakawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Kenta SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Tomoya ShamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Kazuyoshi ShigaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Hiroyuki SagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.
Tatsuya TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Nobuo OchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toyota Memorial Hospital, 1-1 Heiwa-cho, Toyota, Aichi, 471-8513, Japan.
Kazuki HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nagoya City University East Medical Center, 1-2-23 Wakamizu, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8547, Japan.
Shuji TakiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 467-8601, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomical variations of the pancreatic duct are common; however, two closely approximated ductal lumens at the margin of pancreatic transection present a distinct reconstructive challenge during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). When the inter-ductal distance is minimal, conventional assumptions underlying pancreaticojejunostomy may not apply. CASE PRESENTATION: In this two-case report, two patients undergoing PD were preoperatively diagnosed with dual pancreatic ducts by contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Histopathological assessment demonstrated minimal inter-ductal distances (3.05 mm and 0.35 mm) at the transection margin in each patient. Separate duct-to-mucosa anastomoses were considered technically unfavorable because the pancreatic parenchymal cuffs were too small to allow secure suturing and because of the risk of ischemia in the narrow intervening pancreatic bridge. Therefore, a ductal unification strategy was adopted. The septum between the ducts was sealed using an ultrasonic device, divided under hemostatic control, and sutured to create a single ductal orifice. Standard duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy was then performed within the Blumgart framework. Both patients had uneventful postoperative courses without clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulae.

conclusionDuctal unification may represent a feasible technical option in carefully selected cases of closely approximated dual pancreatic ducts, but further experience is required before any recommendation can be made.

Indexed as

Pancreatic DuctsPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomyAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCase reportDual pancreatic ductsDuctal unificationPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomy

Identifiers

PMID42432604
PMCPMC13637187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.