Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432594›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Immunohistochemical evaluation of molecular subtypes in muscle invasive bladder cancer with demographic correlation.

Pranita Mohanty, Megha Subhangini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pranita MohantyDept of Pathology, IMS & SUM Hospital, Siksha'O'Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India. pranitamohanty@soa.ac.in.
Megha SubhanginiDept of Pathology, IMS & SUM Hospital, Siksha'O'Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with variable clinical outcomes. Molecular subtyping has improved understanding of tumor biology and therapeutic stratification. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 64 cases of MIBC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using GATA3, CK5/6, p53, and FGFR3 to classify tumours into molecular subtypes. HER2 expression was also evaluated and correlated with clinicopathological parameters.

resultsLuminal subtype was predominant (76.6%). CK5/6 positivity was observed in 38.3% of cases. Aberrant p53 expression was noted in 79.8% of tumours. FGFR3 expression was detected in 17% of cases and was significantly associated with luminal subtype. HER2 overexpression was more frequent in luminal tumours. Basal tumours showed better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas luminal tumours demonstrated higher FGFR3 and HER2 expression. p53-altered tumours showed features of chemoresistance.

conclusionIHC-based molecular classification is a practical surrogate for transcriptomic profiling in MIBC and may assist in prognostication and therapeutic decision-making.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGATA3 Transcription FactorHumansImmunohistochemistryKeratin-5Keratin-6MaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFGFR3 protein, humanGATA3 protein, humanGATA3 Transcription FactorKeratin-5Keratin-6KRT5 protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Bladder cancerCK5/6FGFR3GATA3HER2ImmunohistochemistryMolecular subtypesMuscle-invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID42432594
PMCPMC13637132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.