ArticleBMC public health2026
Psychological distress and drinking patterns among working-age adults in Japan: a population-based analysis.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe self-medication hypothesis proposes that psychological distress may contribute to increased alcohol use, yet population-level evidence in Japan remains limited. To examine population-level associations between psychological distress (K6) and drinking status among working-age adults in Japan, with comprehensive adjustment for sociodemographic and behavioral covariates.
methodsWe analyzed anonymized official statistical microdata from the 2019 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions (Japan). Respondents aged 20-64 years with complete data were included (n = 3,935). Psychological distress was measured using K6 and categorized as low (0-4), moderate (5-12), and high (≥ 13). Drinking status was derived from frequency and amount per drinking day: heavy drinking was defined as estimated ethanol intake ≥ 44 g/day (≥ 2 gou/day); non-drinkers included "rarely," "quit," or "do not drink"; remaining participants were moderate drinkers (reference). Multinomial logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for heavy vs. moderate and non-drinkers vs. moderate, adjusting for age, gender, household composition, education, employment, income quartile, smoking, and psychiatric outpatient care.
resultsOf 3,935 participants, 20.6% were heavy drinkers (n = 810), 38.8% moderate drinkers (n = 1,527), and 40.6% non-drinkers (n = 1,598). High distress accounted for 4.5% (n = 177) and moderate distress for 25.3% (n = 995). Psychological distress was not associated with drinking status in cross-tabulations (p = 0.578). In adjusted models, distress was not significantly associated with heavy drinking or non-drinking. Moderate distress showed a borderline tendency toward heavy drinkers (aOR 1.21, p = 0.073), while high distress was null (aOR 1.02, p = 0.927). Covariates showed robust associations, including lower odds of heavy drinkers and higher odds of non-drinkers among women, higher odds of both heavy drinkers and non-drinkers among adults aged 20-39 (vs. 60-64), and strong positive association between smokers and heavy drinkers.
conclusionsPsychological distress was not an independent predictor of drinking status after adjustment, suggesting limited support for a simple population-level self-medication pathway in Japan. Longitudinal studies and subgroup analyses are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.