ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Views of healthcare providers on the provision of continuous care during labour by maternity care assistants in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous care during labour has proven to be beneficial in reducing the need for medical intervention, such as epidural anaesthesia and caesarean sections, but is yet to be implemented on a large scale. The Continuous Care Trial looked at effectivity and costs of continuous care by maternity care assistants. Complementary to the Continuous Care Trial and in the interest of implementation, this study aims to explore the experiences of involved healthcare providers.
methodsThis is a descriptive qualitative study. Data were collected through individual interviews and focus group discussions based on a semi-structured interview guide with 17 healthcare providers involved in the provision of continuous care. Manifest content analysis was conducted using the methodology of Graneheim and Lundman to extract categories from the data.
findingsThree main categories were identified: 'experiences with continuous care by maternity care assistants', 'perceived value of continuous care' and 'suggestions for further implementation'. Participants were positive about the provision of continuous care by maternity care assistants. Reservations about the added value of continuous care depended on professional background and setting. Specific aspects for improvement were training and the collaboration within hospital setting. DISCUSSION: The findings advocate for an expansion of preparatory and evaluative activities when implementing continuous care, as acceptance of the intervention by healthcare providers is a major determinant for the implementation, especially in hospitals. The findings of this study are of broader interest internationally, given the rising interest in feasible ways to implement continuous support during birth.
conclusionThis study highlights the necessity of improvements in education and collaboration in hospitals to enhance acceptance of implementation of continuous care during labour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.