ArticleBMC public health2026
Absolute and relative socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation among adults aged 40-74 years in South Korea: a repeated cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer is the leading cause of death in South Korea, underscoring the importance of screening. Despite the implementation of the National Cancer Screening Programme, persistent socioeconomic disparities remain a public health challenge. While previous studies have examined income-related inequalities in cancer screening, education-related inequalities have received comparatively less attention, and few studies have simultaneously quantified both dimensions of socioeconomic inequality over time. We aimed to quantify the absolute and relative socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening among Korean adults aged 40-74 years.
methodsUsing repeated cross-sectional data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2024), age- and sex-adjusted Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) were estimated annually, with the RII estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance to yield prevalence-ratio-based estimates. Joinpoint regression was used to assess temporal trends, and the Wagstaff Concentration Index (C-index) decomposition was used to identify contributing factors.
resultsAltogether, 31,272 participants were included. Overall screening rates increased from 69.0% in 2016 to 74.6% in 2024. Pro-rich inequalities persisted throughout the study period, with positive SII values and RII values greater than 1. Education-related inequality peaked in 2018 (SII 0.21; RII 1.34) and declined in 2024 (SII 0.10; RII 1.14), with no significant trend (SII: Annual Percent Change [APC] -4.25%, P = 0.142; RII: APC -0.98%, P = 0.225). Income-related inequality was consistently larger than education-related inequality across all years, peaked in 2016 (SII 0.27; RII 1.47) and declined significantly (SII: APC -3.26%, P = 0.011; RII: APC -1.36%, P = 0.010). The C-index decomposition indicated that income-related inequality was associated with several observed socioeconomic and healthcare coverage factors. Non-enrolment in private health insurance was a consistent positive contributor across all years, while unemployment or economic inactivity and Medical Aid beneficiary status showed larger positive contributions during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
conclusionDespite increases in overall screening uptake, socioeconomic inequalities favouring advantaged groups persisted in South Korea. The narrowing of income-based disparities is consistent with partial mitigation of financial barriers, whereas education-based disparities persisted. Achieving equitable screening will require multifaceted interventions, including sickness benefits, tailored health literacy support, and proactive community outreach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.