ArticleBMC public health2026
Attitudes toward dating violence and their relationship with gender role attitudes among university students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDating violence is an important public health and psychosocial concern among young adults. Gender role attitudes may be associated with whether violent behaviors within intimate relationships are recognized, tolerated, or normalized. Evidence regarding gender differences and subscale-level associations between attitudes toward dating violence and gender role attitudes among university students remains limited. This study aimed to examine university students' attitudes toward dating violence and gender roles, compare total and subscale scores by gender, and investigate associations between the two constructs.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 1,866 students at a state university. Data were collected using a sociodemographic form, the Dating Violence Attitude Scale, and the Gender Roles Attitude Scale. Gender comparisons were performed using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate. Associations between attitudes toward dating violence, gender role attitudes, and age were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients.
resultsThe observed Dating Violence Attitude Scale scores suggested relatively low reported acceptance of dating violence; however, this interpretation was descriptive because the scale has no established categorical cut-off point. Male students had higher total Dating Violence Attitude Scale scores than female students, indicating lower reported acceptance, although the effect was very small and was the only gender difference on this scale that remained significant after Bonferroni correction (r = 0.06, p = 0.006). Differences in physical and economic violence subscales did not remain significant after correction. Male students had higher total Gender Roles Attitude Scale scores and higher female, marital, traditional, and male gender role subscale scores, whereas female students had higher egalitarian gender role subscale scores. Total Dating Violence Attitude Scale and Gender Roles Attitude Scale scores were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.35, p < 0.001).
conclusionsGender role attitudes were associated with attitudes toward dating violence. Because of the cross-sectional and correlational design, these findings do not establish causal, predictive, or behavioral effects. Future longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to clarify the direction and practical relevance of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.