Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432554›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Attitudes toward dating violence and their relationship with gender role attitudes among university students: a cross-sectional study.

Umut Balatacı, Bari Ay, Rıfat Tarhan, Ayşegül Ay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Umut BalatacıDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Biruni University, İstanbul, Türkiye. umutbltcmail@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-1673
Bari AyClinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Private Clinic, Karabük, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9740-3716
Rıfat TarhanDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Karabük University Faculty, Karabük, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8781-0560
Ayşegül AyDepartment of Medical Services and Techniques, Operating Room Services Program, Vocational School of Health Services, Karabük University, Karabük, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-5248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDating violence is an important public health and psychosocial concern among young adults. Gender role attitudes may be associated with whether violent behaviors within intimate relationships are recognized, tolerated, or normalized. Evidence regarding gender differences and subscale-level associations between attitudes toward dating violence and gender role attitudes among university students remains limited. This study aimed to examine university students' attitudes toward dating violence and gender roles, compare total and subscale scores by gender, and investigate associations between the two constructs.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 1,866 students at a state university. Data were collected using a sociodemographic form, the Dating Violence Attitude Scale, and the Gender Roles Attitude Scale. Gender comparisons were performed using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate. Associations between attitudes toward dating violence, gender role attitudes, and age were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients.

resultsThe observed Dating Violence Attitude Scale scores suggested relatively low reported acceptance of dating violence; however, this interpretation was descriptive because the scale has no established categorical cut-off point. Male students had higher total Dating Violence Attitude Scale scores than female students, indicating lower reported acceptance, although the effect was very small and was the only gender difference on this scale that remained significant after Bonferroni correction (r = 0.06, p = 0.006). Differences in physical and economic violence subscales did not remain significant after correction. Male students had higher total Gender Roles Attitude Scale scores and higher female, marital, traditional, and male gender role subscale scores, whereas female students had higher egalitarian gender role subscale scores. Total Dating Violence Attitude Scale and Gender Roles Attitude Scale scores were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.35, p < 0.001).

conclusionsGender role attitudes were associated with attitudes toward dating violence. Because of the cross-sectional and correlational design, these findings do not establish causal, predictive, or behavioral effects. Future longitudinal and experimental studies are needed to clarify the direction and practical relevance of these associations.

Indexed as

AttitudeGender RoleIntimate Partner ViolenceStudentsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAttitudes toward violenceCross-sectional studyDating violenceGender role attitudesTürkiyeUniversity studentsYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID42432554
PMCPMC13637144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.