SynthesisBMC medical imaging2026
Performance of compressed-sensing cardiac accelerated cine MR in evaluating left ventricular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the consistency of left ventricular (LV) characteristics on cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images acquired from compressed-sensing (CS) accelerated cine versus standard segmented cine (Std-cine) sequences, both utilizing a balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) readout. MATERIALS &
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched for studies where both CS-cine and Std-cine sequences were performed for individual participants and LV characteristic data from the two sequences were reported separately. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility of the retrieved studies and extracted data. Key outcomes included LV ejection fraction (LVEF), volume, mass, and image quality. We performed subgroup analyses for children, breath control, arrhythmia, and MRI field intensity.
resultsThirty-five studies were included. The LVEF (%) obtained from CS-cine imaging did not differ from that obtained from Std-cine imaging (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.05; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: -0.11, 0.01; p = 0.12; I
conclusionsCS-accelerated cine imaging and standard segmented cine imaging did not differ in their ability to evaluate LV characteristics. The CS-cine images quality was acceptable and superior to that of conventional cine images for arrhythmias. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022328219.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.