ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Dual-attention temporal graph neural network on resting-state fMRI dynamic functional connectivity identifies risk-related patterns of migraine chronification.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMigraine chronification remains difficult to characterize at the individual level, and robust baseline imaging markers associated with subsequent conversion from episodic migraine (EM) to chronic migraine (CM) are lacking. Resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) captures transient brain network interactions, but conventional approaches provide limited interpretability for clinical translation.
methodsWe enrolled 195 participants at baseline, including 95 healthy controls (HC) and 100 patients with episodic migraine at baseline. All migraine patients underwent baseline rs-fMRI during the interictal phase and were followed for 12 months; 70 remained EM (non-converters) and 30 converted to CM. Sliding-window dFC matrices (55-TR window, 2-TR step) were constructed from 142 regions of interest and represented as temporal graph sequences. We developed an interpretable temporal graph neural network integrating a two-layer graph isomorphism network, a gated recurrent unit, and dual spatial-temporal attention mechanisms to quantify node-level ("where") and window-level ("when") importance. A multilayer perceptron performed three-class discrimination among HC, EM non-converters, and CM converters. Model performance was evaluated using stratified ten-fold cross-validation. Edge-wise ANCOVA controlling for age, sex, and mean framewise displacement with false discovery rate correction was applied to dFC matrices at key temporal-attention windows and within k-means-derived dFC states.
resultsFour recurrent dFC states were identified. State 3 showed the highest fractional occupancy and mean dwell time and was the only state with significant between-group edge-wise differences after correction. Compared with HC, migraine groups exhibited altered connectivity involving sensory, attention, default-mode, and subcortical systems. CM converters showed additional baseline abnormalities involving sensorimotor-visual, default-mode, ventral attention, and limbic-related circuits. Spatial attention shifted from occipital-frontoparietal hubs in HC to frontal-insular prominence in EM non-converters and a frontoparietal-limbic configuration in CM converters. Temporal attention peaked at window 23, where chronification-related abnormalities were most evident. The model achieved AUCs of 0.817(HC), 0.832(EM non-converters), and 0.874(CM converters), with a macro-AUC of 0.841 (95% CI 0.77-0.91). Findings were robust across alternative window lengths and step sizes.
conclusionsThis rs-fMRI dFC-based temporal graph learning framework identified baseline spatiotemporal network patterns associated with subsequent migraine chronification and generated individualized time-resolved importance maps. Although the model showed promising internal discriminative performance, these findings should be interpreted as risk-related pattern identification rather than as evidence of a clinically validated prediction tool. External prospective multicenter validation is required before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.