ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of an accelerated treatment protocol for traumatic haemothorax and pneumothorax: a prospective, multicentre observational study in South Africa.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPenetrating pneumothorax and haemothorax are common injuries seen in South African trauma centres. Hospitals in the Western Cape Province of South Africa utilize a protocol for the expedited management of patients with chest injuries requiring intercostal drains (ICD) within emergency department observation units, with emphasis on early mobilization and pulmonary rehabilitation. The study objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Western Cape ICD protocol for unilateral traumatic pneumothorax, haemothorax, or pneumo-haemothorax.
methodsThis was a prospective, observational, multi-centre cohort study that enrolled adult (≥ 18 years) patients within four public hospitals (primary, secondary, tertiary) in the Western Cape Province from 2024 to 2025. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they received ICD protocol care at any of the participating hospitals. We performed a descriptive analysis of patient injury profiles, complications, hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmissions. The primary outcome was hospital length-of-stay with a hypothesis that > 50% of patients will be discharged ≤ 72 h.
results497 patients were enrolled, with 92% male, and median age 29.2. Most (87.7%) were injured by stabbing/cutting mechanisms, and 53.5% had a haemothorax. There were procedural complications among 10.3% of cases (n = 51), including deep placement (n = 25), shallow placement (n = 8), kinked ICD (n = 8), sub-optimal intrapleural placement (too cephalad/caudad; n = 4) and extra-pleural location (n = 4). There were delayed complications among 7.6% of the cohort (n = 38). Common delayed complications included ICD dislodgment (n = 9), premature ICD removal (n = 6), retained haemothorax (n = 6), and infection (n = 15, including 3 empyema, 5 pneumonia, and 9 superficial ICD site infection). Hospital length of stay was a median of 3 days (IQR 2-4). There were no in-hospital deaths, and only 14 patients (2.8%) were readmitted within 30 days.
conclusionOur cohort had a composite complication rate of 16.7% at the patient-level, combining malpositioning and delayed complications, suggesting that the Western Cape protocol is safe compared to standard of care for the treatment of simple traumatic pneumothorax and haemothorax.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.