SynthesisBMC geriatrics2026
Frailty assessment and effect of physical activity interventions in older adults: a scoping review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation ageing is accelerating worldwide, leading to a rising prevalence of frailty, a potentially reversible condition. Physical activity (PA) is a promising strategy to mitigate frailty, but heterogeneity in its definition and assessment has led to wide variation in measurement tools and intervention approaches. This study aimed to map frailty assessment methods and PA interventions in frail and pre-frail older adults, and to evaluate their effectiveness using meta-analysis and meta-regression.
methodsA scoping review was conducted in April 2025 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, including studies published up to 2024. Eligible studies were intervention trials involving adults aged ≥ 60 years, reported a PA program and a validated frailty assessment. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed on randomized controlled trials reporting Fried frailty scores. Mean differences were pooled using a random-effects model, with additional analyses to explore the influence of intervention characteristics.
resultsA total of 163 studies were included. Frailty was assessed using 47 different tools, most frequently the Fried phenotype. Interventions were predominantly multicomponent, combining resistance, aerobic, balance, and flexibility exercises, typically delivered 2-3 times per week in supervised settings. Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, PA interventions significantly reduced Fried frailty scores (MD = -0.71; 95% CI [-0.92, -0.49]; p < 0.0001). Baseline frailty level (p = 0.0125), session frequency (p = 0.01), and intervention context (p = 0.0008) significantly influenced outcomes.
conclusionPhysical activity interventions are associated with reductions in frailty when assessed using the Fried phenotype. However, substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment and intervention reporting limits comparability and clinical translation. Standardization of frailty measures and improved reporting of intervention characteristics are needed to optimize and implement effective PA strategies in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.