ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2026
The role of pelvic floor muscle training in the management of idiopathic fecal incontinence: a single-center prospective study.
Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent yet underreported condition that significantly impairs quality of life and social functioning. Conservative treatment, particularly pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), plays a key role in patients with mild sphincter dysfunction or those not eligible for surgical intervention. However, the impact of professional supervision on the effectiveness of PFMT remains insufficiently explored.
methodsThe study included 124 patients with fecal incontinence treated at a proctology department and 30 patients in the study control group (without fecal incontinence). The study group was divided into two groups: patients performing PFMT under physiotherapist supervision (n = 64) and patients exercising independently without professional supervision (n = 60). All participants underwent anorectal manometry and completed questionnaires assessing fecal incontinence severity using a modified Wexner scale before and after a 6-week exercise program. Resting and squeeze anal pressures were analyzed.
resultsBefore therapy, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups. After completion of the rehabilitation program, patients exercising under physiotherapist supervision showed a significantly greater reduction in fecal incontinence-related lifestyle alterations than the unsupervised group. Supervised PFMT was associated with a significant improvement in functional outcomes, whereas no significant improvement was observed in patients exercising independently. In both groups, an increase in sphincter contraction pressure and improved retention of liquid stool were noted.
conclusionsPelvic floor muscle exercises are an effective conservative treatment for fecal incontinence; however, physiotherapist-supervised training yields superior clinical outcomes compared with unsupervised exercise. Professional supervision, appropriate patient qualification, and patient motivation are key factors influencing the success of pelvic floor rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.