ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Muscles as Basic Therapeutic Units in Glabellar Botulinum Toxin Injection: Technique Description and Preliminary Clinical Experience.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBotulinum toxin (BTX) injection remains the mainstay for addressing dynamic glabellar lines. However, traditional morphology-based classifications may not exhaustively encompass the heterogeneous sums of glabellar muscular vectors. This study aims to propose and evaluate the efficacy of a muscle-based strategy that centers on direct assessment and neuromodulation of expression muscles contributing to glabellar lines.
methodsA retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent BTX injection between July 2022 and July 2025. Expression muscles that potentially contribute to glabellar lines, including depressor supercilii, corrugator supercilii, procerus, frontalis, and orbicularis oculi, were sequentially assessed during exertive frowning and accordingly neuromodulated. Esthetic outcomes were recorded through standardized photographs taken at baseline and follow-ups. Patient satisfaction was assessed using FACE-Q questionnaires and a self-designed patient-reported discomfort grading scale.
resultsA total of 823 patients were included in the study, reporting generally high satisfaction rates. No severe complications were recorded; transient ecchymosis occurred in 2.07% of the included cases. Post-treatment discomfort or unnatural expressions were reported by 12.39% of the cohort, with 79.41% resolving spontaneously within 2 weeks.
conclusionsThis muscle-based paradigm provides an anatomically guided, conceptually intuitive framework for glabellar line treatment, with a favorable safety profile, yet its clinical advantages over conventional approaches remain to be further validated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42432378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.