ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Matched case-control study of odontoid osteosynthesis vs hard collar immobilisation for Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: higher risk of adverse events with no long-term functional benefits.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOdontoid fractures in the elderly carry high morbidity and mortality, yet optimal management remains controversial. This study compares functional and radiological outcomes between anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) and hard collar immobilisation in elderly patients with acute Type II odontoid fractures.
methodsSingle-centre matched case-control study of AOSF versus hard collar immobilisation in patients ≥ 65 years. Patients were matched using clinical outcome predictors (age; frailty; co-morbidities; fracture morphology). Included patients were deemed by the lead surgeon and multidisciplinary team to have sufficient clinical equipoise between operative and non-operative management. Outcomes were collected retrospectively (complications, mortality, union rates, screw positioning) and prospectively using patient-reported outcome measures (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]; Neck Disability Index [NDI]; EQ-5D-5 L; Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale [DOSS]).
resultsOf 381 acute odontoid fractures, 70 met the inclusion criteria (35 AOSF; 35 matched Hard Collar). The operative group had longer hospitalisation (21 ± 23.69 vs. 11 ± 7.52 days; p = 0.042) and higher incidence of adverse events per patient (2.17 vs. 0.91, p < 0.001). Dysphagia occurred in 46% of operative cases. Seven screw-related complications occurred, with one revision. Three treatment-related deaths occurred in the operative group; none in the conservative. Functional outcomes were similar between groups; however, neck pain (VAS) was lower following AOSF (2.00 ± 2.02 vs. 4.69 ± 3.95; p = 0.008). Non-union rates were comparable.
conclusionsOdontoid osteosynthesis was associated with longer hospitalisation, treatment-related morbidity and mortality, while demonstrating a marginal improvement in neck pain. Larger randomised studies are needed to determine the role of AOSF in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42432331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.