ReviewBiological trace element research2026
Toxic metals in Cosmetic and Personal Care Products: Occurrence, Concentrations, and Health Risks.
Review in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given their general use and continued exposure to humans, toxic metals in cosmetics and personal care products are an emerging public health concern. The review discusses the occurrence, concentration, analytical detection and health risks of toxic metals commonly found in cosmetics, including Pb, Cd, Hg, As, Cr, and Ni. The amount of these metals differed greatly depending on the product and region. For instance, Pb concentrations in some kohl products were above 440,000 µg/g, Cr in some lipsticks reached 2554 µg/g, and mercury in some skin-lightening creams averaged 1008 µg/g. Hair dyes, eye cosmetics, nail products, lipsticks, and skin-whitening creams were identified as major sources of exposure. Different analytical methods, including FAAS, GFAAS, ICP-OES, ICP-MS, and XRF spectroscopy, are commonly used to measure these metals. The review further discusses dermal absorption pathways, bioaccumulation, and carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks associated with long-term cosmetic use, as well as the current regulatory guidelines. Although some products met safety standards, many exceeded international limits, showing the need for stricter regulations, regular testing, standard methods, and better public awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42432273What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.