Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42432214›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Ultrahypofractionation of localized prostate cancer-an updated statement of the prostate cancer working group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).

A-C Müller, D M Aebersold, C Albrecht, D Boehmer, U Ganswindt, N-S Schmidt-Hegemann, S Höcht, E Hoffmann, T Hölscher, S A Koerber and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

A-C MüllerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RKH Hospital Ludwigsburg, Posilipostraße 4, 71640, Ludwigsburg, Germany. arndt-christian.mueller@rkh-gesundheit.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-0682
D M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstraße 4, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
C AlbrechtNordstrahl Radiation Oncology Unit, Nürnberg North Hospital, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Str. 1, 90149, Nürnberg, Germany.
D Boehmercorporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
U GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
N-S Schmidt-HegemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
S HöchtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital Potsdam, Charlottenstraße 72, 14467, Potsdam, Germany.
E HoffmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen (UKT), Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
T HölscherDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, Dresden, Germany.
S A KoerberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Germany.
P NiehoffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sana Hospital Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany.
J C PeekenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
M PinkawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, WEGE-Klinik, Villenstraße 8, 53129, Bonn, Germany.
B PolatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
M ShelanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
S K B SpohnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
F WolfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus University Hospital Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
C ZamboglouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, RKH Hospital Ludwigsburg, Posilipostraße 4, 71640, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
D Zipscorporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
T WiegelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among men in Germany. Radiation therapy is a standard treatment for localized PCa. Ultrahypofractionation (UHF) delivers high doses in fewer fractions, thus offering a time-efficient option compared to traditional standard fractionation lasting for 7-8 weeks. The German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) expert panel statement provides an updated evaluation of randomized trials with at least 5 years of follow-up.

methodsThe members of the DEGRO PCa working group performed a literature search for randomized trials of UHF for localized prostate cancer in March 2025. The analysis included phase III randomized trials with at least 5 years of follow-up: HYPO-RT-PC, PACE‑B, and a proton therapy trial.

resultsAll trials demonstrated noninferiority of UHF radiotherapy in maintaining disease control. The HYPO-RT-PC trial reported a 5‑year failure-free survival rate of 84% in both treatment groups and PACE‑B reported noninferiority with a 95.8% rate in the SBRT group compared to 94.6% in the control group. Acute urinary and bowel toxicities were more pronounced in UHF arms but resolved over time. Late urinary toxicity was significantly higher in SBRT patients (26.9% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001, PACE-B). Proton SBRT showed slightly increased toxicity measured by sexual and urinary EPIC.

conclusionUltrahypofractionation represents an effective alternative to conventional fractionation in low- to intermediate-risk PCa with similar oncologic outcomes. However, physicians should inform their patients-particularly those with suboptimal urinary function-about an increased risk for GU toxicity.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiation Dose HypofractionationGermanyHumansMaleRadiation OncologyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicConventional fractionationHypofractionationLate toxicityPatient selectionRadiotherapyStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.