ArticleNature biotechnology2026
Efficient in vivo cytosine base editing using virus-like particles with uracil DNA glycosylase inhibition.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overcoming the cytosine base editing barrier: Virus-like particles with uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibition unlocking the clinical potential.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in CRISPR-basedFrontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are promising for delivering genome editors, yet the in vivo in vivo efficacy of VLP-mediated cytosine base editing remains limited. Here we identified insufficient inhibition of uracil DNA glycosylases as the underlying mechanism of low cytosine base editor (CBE) editing efficiencies in vivo. We engineered a previously reported CBE, transformer base editor (tBE), and developed a VLP delivery system to enhance the recruitment of uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor proteins. tBE-VLPs achieved robust C-to-T editing in mouse liver and retina. A single injection achieved, on average, 46.0% editing at mPcsk9 and 64.2% at mHpd in the liver, as well as 24.2% at mVegfa in the retinal pigment epithelium, resulting in marked therapeutic benefits in mouse disease models. tBE-VLP4 induced no detectable off-target edits in vitro or in vivo and demonstrated superior specificity compared to AAV or lipid nanoparticle mRNA delivery. Our work establishes tBE-VLP4 as a precise, efficient system for in vivo cytosine base editing.
Identifiers
42432197What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.