ArticleScientific reports2026
Trust in government, public health authorities, health scientists and medical care providers and COVID-19 vaccines among Canadian adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic has passed, skepticism regarding vaccine safety, efficacy, and trust in public institutions continues to influence public attitudes toward vaccination in Canada and internationally. Recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, have renewed concerns about trust in vaccines and the factors that shape it. This study examined associations between trust in government, public health authorities, health scientists, and medical care providers, and trust in COVID-19 vaccines among 5607 Canadian adults. Participants were recruited in May 2024 through quota sampling, and weighted to reflect the 2021 Canadian Census. Trust in federal and provincial/territorial government, public health authorities, health scientists, and medical care providers was based on their performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccine trust (outcome variable) was categorized as trusting, neutral, or distrusting. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics, vaccination behaviours, and information sources. Multivariable multinomial regression estimated relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Overall, 63% of participants trusted COVID-19 vaccines, and 20% reported distrust. Support for family vaccination and willingness to be vaccinated were the strongest predictors of trust. Trust in health scientists, medical providers, public health authorities, and federal and provincial government was positively associated with vaccine trust. Vaccine trust was lower among adults aged 35-54 years, women but higher among residents of the Prairie provinces and northern territories compared with Ontario residents. Vaccine distrust was higher among unvaccinated individuals, and lower among higher-income households. These findings highlight the role of institutional trust in shaping trust in COVID-19 vaccines and informing targeted public health strategies to address persistent vaccine hesitancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42432028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.