Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42431956›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of hemorrhoid patients regarding surgical treatment.

Yan Hu, Xihong Wang, Lihong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan HuDepartment of Urology/Pelvic Floor Andrology, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. marry16166@163.com.
Xihong WangDepartment of Urology/Pelvic Floor Andrology, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lihong ChenDepartment of Urology/Pelvic Floor Andrology, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of patients with hemorrhoids concerning surgical treatment. This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2023 and February 2025 in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China and included patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids. Data were collected through a self-designed structured questionnaire, which included sections on sociodemographic characteristics and evaluated participants' KAP related to surgical treatment. A total of 431 patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids participated in the study. The mean knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 8.01 ± 3.07 (possible range: 0-18), 30.61 ± 2.16 (possible range: 7-35), and 34.68 ± 4.73 (possible range: 8-40), respectively. The results of the SEM analysis shown that attitude had a direct effect on practice (β = 0.378, P < 0.001). However, neither the direct effect of knowledge on attitude and practice nor the indirect effect of knowledge on practice was significant. Patients with hemorrhoids exhibited limited knowledge but generally positive attitudes and proactive practices regarding surgical treatment, with attitudes emerging as the primary driver of practice behaviors. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at improving patient outcomes should prioritize attitude-based education strategies, while also addressing knowledge gaps to support informed decision-making.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHemorrhoidsAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-sectional studiesHealth knowledge, attitudes, practiceHemorrhoidsPatient educationSurgical procedures, operative

Identifiers

PMID42431956
PMCPMC13503939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.