Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42431929›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A robust binary secretary bird optimization method for high-dimensional data classification.

Reham Kamal, Eman Amin, Diaa Salama AbdElminaam, Rasha Ismail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reham KamalFaculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. riham.mohamed@miuegypt.edu.eg.
Eman AminFaculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Diaa Salama AbdElminaamFaculty of Computer Science, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt. diaa.salama@miuegypt.edu.eg.
Rasha IsmailFaculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feature selection is a key step in machine learning-based decision systems, especially in medical and biomedical applications, where datasets often contain a large number of features that can negatively affect both accuracy and interpretability. In this study, we introduce the binary secretary bird optimization algorithm (B-SBOA), a binary version of the secretary bird optimization algorithm specifically developed for feature selection tasks. The proposed approach translates the hunting and escape behaviors of the secretary bird into effective binary search strategies, allowing a well-balanced trade-off between exploration and exploitation. B-SBOA was tested on twenty-five benchmark datasets from the UCI repository and compared with nine well-known binary metaheuristic algorithms, including PSO, GWO, MPA, HBO, SMA, SFOA, DOA, SCA, and MSO. The experimental results show that B-SBOA consistently delivers performance that is either superior to or competitive with existing methods across F-score, precision, recall, and other standard metrics. B-SBOA was evaluated on 25 benchmark datasets from the UCI repository and compared with nine well-known binary metaheuristic algorithms. The results show that B-SBOA achieves superior performance, with average improvements reaching 3-8% in F-score and 2-6% in precision and recall compared to competing methods. In several high-dimensional datasets such as Arrhythmia and Hillvalley, the proposed method achieved the highest classification accuracy while reducing the number of selected features.

Indexed as

Binary secretary bird optimization algorithmEvolutionary algorithmsFeature selectionMachine learningMetaheuristic optimizationSecretary bird optimization algorithm (SBOA)

Identifiers

PMID42431929
PMCPMC13354761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.