ArticleScientific reports2026
Novelty stressor induces differential brain oxidative stress and antioxidant profiles between proactive and reactive stress coping styles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroendocrine stressors can disrupt the brain's redox equilibrium by generating high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that lead to oxidative stress. To what extent the relationship between neuroendocrine and oxidative stress is modulated by stress coping styles remain unclear. We subjected proactive and reactive zebrafish to an acute novelty stressor (i.e. neuroendocrine stressor), and quantified changes in behavior and whole brain biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidants (DNA damage, total glutathione (GSH), glutathione ratio, oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Fish exposed to the novelty stressor had significantly higher total glutathione, trend for higher ORAC, DNA damage, and glutathione ratio, and trend for lower SOD levels than controls. Those with a reactive stress coping style exhibited significantly higher levels of SOD and glutathione ratio, and a trend for higher ORAC compared to proactive. Principal component analysis showed that reactive individuals that experienced the novelty stressor had significantly higher composite antioxidant scores than proactive. Our data show that exposure to a novelty stressor results in changes to antioxidant and oxidative stress levels in the brain that differs by stress coping style. Reactive individuals showed elevated antioxidant capacity. Overall, our findings suggest that elevated reactivity to neuroendocrine stressors commonly seen in reactive stress coping styles may be mitigated through the glutathione buffering system and other antioxidants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.