Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42431847›Full record

ReviewEcology letters2026

Biological Sex Is Binary and Rooted in Anisogamy.

Tim Janicke, Göran Arnqvist, Pierre-André Crochet, Patrice David, Philippe Jarne, Jussi Lehtonen, Thomas Lenormand, Edward H Morrow, Geoff A Parker, Paul A Saunders and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tim JanickeCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-6813
Göran ArnqvistDepartment of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3501-3376
Pierre-André CrochetCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-3960
Patrice DavidCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4588-990X
Philippe JarneCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6291-1999
Jussi LehtonenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-1041
Thomas LenormandCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8930-5393
Edward H MorrowDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1853-7469
Geoff A ParkerDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4795-6352
Paul A SaundersCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-0472
Jeanne TonnabelISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-6965
Frédéric VeyrunesISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-9915
Christoph R HaagCEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-1431

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-25-CE02-1229European Union 101171163Research Council of Finland 340130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of biological sex has become a renewed focus of societal debate, fuelled by the conflation of biological principles with discussions of human gender diversity. Here, we argue that conceptual clarity critically depends on separating these domains. Drawing on evolutionary theory and empirical evidence, we maintain that biological sex is best defined as a binary classification of male and female reproductive strategies rooted in anisogamy, characterised by the production of two discrete gamete types of different sizes. We stress that gamete size constitutes the ultimate criterion for biological sex and that this definition applies consistently across sexual systems, from separate-sexed species to hermaphrodites, irrespective of variation in karyotype, hormonal profile, somatic phenotype, or behaviour. Further, we emphasise that evolutionary insights offer a coherent explanation for recurring, though not universal, associations between biological sex and patterns of sex-specific selection, sexual dimorphism and parental care. We conclude that the definition of biological sex as a binary classification based on gamete size is a powerful scientific framework compatible with the diversity of sexual phenotypes found in anisogamous organisms and distinct from the concept of human gender.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGerm CellsSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleReproductiondefinitiongametessexual dimorphismsexual reproduction

Identifiers

PMID42431847
PMCPMC13354727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.