Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42431669›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Role of socioeconomic deprivation on inequities in care outcomes of haematological malignancies treated with stem cell transplant in the UK: a systematic review protocol.

Zareen Deplano, Samuel Cusworth, Carolyn Doree, James Griffin, Nicola Adderley, Joht Singh Chandan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zareen DeplanoDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK zbd338@student.bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4366-8344
Samuel CusworthDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2904-5102
Carolyn DoreeSystematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
James GriffinCell, Apheresis & Gene Therapies, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, UK.
Nicola AdderleyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-3254
Joht Singh ChandanDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStem cell transplant (SCT) is a potential cure for haematological malignancies whose outcomes are predicted to be poor on chemotherapy alone and cases difficult to treat using standard of care treatment. There is growing evidence to show that not all patients who would benefit from SCT receive it due to inequities in the treatment pathway. The role of socioeconomic deprivation on inequities in the SCT setting is unclear due to conflicting findings. We aim to synthesise the UK evidence base in this area from the point of diagnosis to transplant to guide further research and policy to improve survival for underserved patients. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Primary electronic searches will be performed in bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Proquest Databases, Central & CDSR, Stem Cell Evidence and Web of Science and Google Scholar for grey literature. Eligibility criteria will include observational studies of UK patients diagnosed with haematological malignancies treated with SCT, where outcomes are reported according to socioeconomic deprivation. Two independent reviewers will screen each study and assess the quality of all included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa grading system. Outcomes of interest include delay in diagnosis/referral, treatments/interventions received, referral to transplant, presence of comorbidities affecting transplant eligibility, transplant utilisation rates, waiting time to transplant and survival rates. Post-transplant outcomes are beyond the scope of this review. Inequities in SCT due to socioeconomic deprivation will be narratively summarised. Meta-analysis will be conducted dependent on data availability. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (2024: CRD42024620592). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this study as it is a secondary analysis of published data.We are not aware of any ethical concerns regarding SCT or treatment of donors in the studies included in this research. This systematic review will retrieve, screen and extract data from UK research. SCT and the treatment of donors in the UK follow the National Health Service (NHS) and NHS Blood and Transplant guidelines and policies and are regulated by the Human Tissue Authority and Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The data which will be used in this review will consist of data from NHS digital/NHS England or single NHS centre data, which will follow the guidelines and regulations above.The findings will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication, shared at conference presentations, and disseminated to both clinical and patient groups including National (Black, Asian, Mixed Race and Minority Ethnic) BAME Transplant Alliance and the National Institute for Health Research Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024620592.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHematologic NeoplasmsSocial DeprivationStem Cell TransplantationHumansResearch DesignSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSystematic Reviews as TopicUnited KingdomBone marrow transplantationHAEMATOLOGYHealth EquityNeoplasmsProtocols & guidelinesSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID42431669
PMCPMC13358268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.