ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026
A Case of Mangled Foot With Midfoot Bone Defect.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe decision between amputation and reconstruction for mangled feet is often challenging. The foot must be functional for reconstruction to be considered successful. In this report, we present a case of a mangled foot with a metatarsal bone defect. CASE DESCRIPTION: A man in his 50s presented to the hospital after a heavy load fell on his left foot at work. He was diagnosed with an open dislocation fracture of the Lisfranc joint (Gustilo IIIC), a comminuted fracture of the navicular bone, and a defect of the intermediate cuneiform bone. TREATMENT COURSE: A foot ring-type external fixator was applied in an arched position to stabilize the dislocation. An antibiotic cement spacer was inserted into the bone defect. The wound was managed with local negative pressure therapy, followed by placement of an autologous bone graft and a phalangeal skin flap. The patient could walk independently 1 year after surgery. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionThe patient's dislocated fracture of the Lisfranc joint, complicated by the absence of a keystone bone, was reconstructed using a foot ring-type external fixator with wires positioned to preserve the arch mechanism. As a result, both bone reconstruction and soft-tissue reconstruction were achieved, leading to high patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.