Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430484›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Light hydrogen isotopes in terrestrial core.

Yu Zhang, Wenzhong Wang, Zhengbin Deng, Zhongqing Wu, Bowen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu ZhangLaboratory of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID 0009-0000-6584-9724
Wenzhong WangLaboratory of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8824-7475
Zhengbin DengState Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-9241
Zhongqing WuLaboratory of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4842-6380
Bowen ChenLaboratory of Seismology and Physics of the Earth's Interior, School of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7240-0295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of Earth's water remains unresolved. Hydrogen isotopes provide a key tracer of planetary water history, yet the isotope composition of Earth's core-the planet's largest internal reservoir-has remained unconstrained. Here, we use first-principles calculations combined with machine-learning-accelerated path-integral molecular dynamics to quantify hydrogen isotope fractionation between silicate and metallic melts under core-forming conditions. We find that core formation enriched the silicate Earth in deuterium while concentrating isotopically light hydrogen in the core, requiring the proto-Earth to have started with a lower deuterium-to-hydrogen (D/H) ratio than that preserves in the present-day mantle. Our models show that the bulk-Earth D/H ratio can be explained either by direct accretion of enstatite chondrite-dominated material or by isotopic resetting of deuterium-rich planetesimals through interactions with solar nebular gas. These results suggest that Earth's water inventory was established during the earliest stages of accretion.

Identifiers

PMID42430484
PMCPMC13353359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.