ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring the predictability of distributed lag nonlinear models using SARS-CoV-2 wastewater-based surveillance in multiple communities in Alberta, Canada.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWastewater-based surveillance can be an important part of pandemic management, especially when testing capacity of individuals is limited. Statistical modeling can be used to examine the relationship between wastewater pathogen levels and clinical cases. The objective of this study was to examine the utility of distributed lag nonlinear modeling to derive the relationship between wastewater SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and COVID-19 clinical cases across communities in Alberta, Canada when clinical testing was comprehensive.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from 24-hour composite wastewater collected and tested two to three times per week from 11 wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Alberta, Canada during May 10, 2020, to March 15, 2022. The number of daily new cases of COVID-19 downloaded from Alberta Health's centralized dataset of clinical surveillance of COVID-19 were mapped to each sewershed. Distributed lag nonlinear models were fit to describe the exposure-response relationship between the 7-day rolling average of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and daily new cases for each WWTP separately.
resultsThe 11 WWTPs served a population of 3,422,062 (77% of Alberta's population) and 386,528 cases were documented during the study period. From 2021 onward, peaks in both wastewater viral RNA levels and cases tracked reasonably well. For almost all WWTPs, the best fitting model was a Poisson additive model with a P-spline for time. Models for the larger communities had better fits than smaller communities as represented by adjusted pseudo-R2 ranging from 80.7% to 94.4%. Models followed the same general trends as the actual COVID-19 cases over time.
conclusionsWith relationships between wastewater viral RNA levels for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 cases expected to vary over time and to be non-linear, distributed lag nonlinear models are promising. While the form of the models was similar across WWTPs, the resulting estimates were different among sites suggesting site-specific analyses are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.