Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430440›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

In the belly of the beast: How dietary changes and preexisting invasive prey may have promoted the success of a novel invasive amphibian.

Maya J Williams, Julia L Riley, James Baxter-Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maya J WilliamsDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Julia L RileyDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
James Baxter-GilbertDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-8893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions provide unique opportunities to examine how populations cope with rapid ecological change, as well as the influence of human activity on our natural world. The island of Newfoundland, Canada, has no native amphibians; however, five species have established non-native populations, including one caudatan, the Eastern Red-backed Salamander (Plethodon cinereus). We posit that this salamander's successful colonisation may have been mediated by dietary shifts that allowed them to capitalize on a greater variety of prey, as well as by exploiting pre-existing invasive prey communities - both these mechanisms could limit the likelihood of competitive exclusion and promote establishment in a novel environment. To examine this, we identified stomach contents of Newfoundland Eastern Red-backed salamanders, characterised the prey as native or invasive, and compared the dietary composition of the invasive population to that of conspecifics in the native range through a systematic literature review. As predicted, the invasive salamander population's diet is more generalised (i.e., a broader dietary niche) than the native salamanders, and invasive invertebrates comprised two thirds of the volume of prey eaten by invasive salamanders. Our research provides insight into the Niche Breadth Invasion Hypothesis as well as the Invasional Meltdown Hypothesis, which are mechanisms that may have allowed this species to establish a population in an island ecosystem. Furthermore, our research suggests that prior invasions of a diverse invertebrate community to Newfoundland may have bolstered the invasive potential of this novel, non-native salamander.

Indexed as

CaudataDietIntroduced SpeciesPredatory BehaviorAnimalsEcosystemGastrointestinal ContentsNewfoundland and Labrador

Identifiers

PMID42430440
PMCPMC13354068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.