ArticlePloS one2026
Identifying the educational needs of nurses caring for adults with congenital heart disease: A scoping review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this scoping review is to answer the question, "What is the existing evidence on nurses' educational needs in caring for adults with congenital heart disease?" by identifying and summarizing research and grey literature on the educational needs of nurses who care for this population.
methodsThe scoping review will use the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) for reporting. Five databases will be searched: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC, and Scopus. Grey Matters, Google, and thesis and dissertation databases will be used to identify relevant grey literature. All types of published articles and non-empirical research will be included with no temporal, geographical, or language restrictions. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, engage in full-text screening, and perform data extraction in Covidence. Any disagreements will be resolved through a third reviewer.
resultsThe results of the scoping review will be analyzed using descriptive statistics and narrative analysis. The results will be reported using tables and figures. Findings will be disseminated through a manuscript and at conferences.
conclusionThe findings of this scoping review aim to inform future research and interventions on the nursing care of adults with congenital heart disease. REGISTRATION: The scoping review was registered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4t5hr) on December 5, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.