Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430427›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Sexual harassment at work: Targets' perspectives on prevention and response.

Christianne Corbett, Meghan O Warner, Sarah J Harsey, Jennifer J Freyd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christianne CorbettDepartment of Sociology and Criminology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-3285
Meghan O WarnerStanford Introductory Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Sarah J HarseySchool of Psychological Science, Oregon State University - Cascades, Bend, Oregon, United States of America.
Jennifer J FreydUniversity of Washington and Center for Institutional Courage, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9650-9199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harassment, including sexual harassment, in the workplace poses a significant threat to workers' wellbeing and contributes to social inequities. Organizations play a pivotal role in both enabling and preventing workplace harassment. We use a grounded theory approach to understand how workers experience workplace sexual harassment. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with thirty U.S. workers, most from the service industry in the San Francisco Bay Area, who have experienced sexual harassment at work, we describe organizational practices that workers believe effectively prevent and respond to harassment. Findings demonstrate that workplaces may better support workers by (1) setting clear expectations that harassment will not be tolerated and (2) responding effectively to incidents of harassment by establishing an independent entity to whom victims can report incidents, providing verbal support, and taking appropriate actions to support and protect victims.

Indexed as

Sexual HarassmentWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleSan FranciscoWorking Conditions

Identifiers

PMID42430427
PMCPMC13354074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.