ArticlePloS one2026
Sustainable development of protein-fortified Quince (Cydonia oblonga) fruit leather using almond powder: Nutritional quality, antioxidant capacity, and tensile strength.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruit leathers are delicious, convenient and shelf-stable alternative of fresh fruits offering benefits of valuable sources of nutrients, dietary fiber and bioactive compounds. The novelty of almond-fortified quince fruit leather lies in combining quince's natural antioxidants and dietary fiber with the protein and healthy nutrients of almonds to produce nutritionally enriched, plant-based snack. This fortification improves the nutritional and functional value compared to conventional carbohydrate-rich fruit leathers. This research was done to assess the impact of adding almond powder as a protein fortifier in the quince fruit leather. Fruit leather samples were prepared by hot air drying at 65 °C for 8-12 hours. There were five formulations (T0; control; 100% quince pulp), T1 (95% quince pulp + 5% almond powder), T2 (90% quince pulp + 10% almond powder), T3 (85% quince pulp + 15% almond powder) and T4 (80% quince pulp + 20% almond powder). The moisture content and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) reduced significantly among treatments (T0-T4) with values of 23.22% -11.24% and 66.96% -15.79%, respectively. While, fat, fiber, protein and ash contents were significantly increased all over the treatments, with values recorded at T0-T4 (6.60%-33.32%), (17.30%-32.72%), (0.63%-9.18%), and (3.53%-13.19%), respectively. The total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and DPPH radical scavenging activity were also increased significantly and ranged between 164.75 to 170.32 mg GAE/g, 82.91 to 90.38 mg QE/g and 58.29 to 71.53 mg TE/g in T0 and T4, respectively. Water and oil absorption rates were reduced (T0-T4) from 2.17 to 2.12 mg/g and 2.20 to 0.60 mg/g, respectively. The amount of vitamin C dropped considerably in T0 (17.43 mg/100g) to T4 (7.67 mg/100g), respectively. The addition of almond powder significantly affected the texture of quince fruit leather, with tensile strength decreasing from 1.46 MPa (T0) to 0.04 MPa (T4), elongation from 15.66% to 1.07%, and rupture strength from 64.93 N to 22.88 N, reflecting disruption of the pectin network and increased porosity caused by dispersed almond particles. Browning index rose substantially when almond powder is added, and it varies between 33.12 and 51.19 among T0-T4 samples. This study indicated that the T2 showed the best results and demonstrated high nutritional and tensile strength. This fruit leather could potentially be regarded as a high-nutrient, healthy and convenient alternative snack food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.