ArticlePloS one2026
The relationship between esports and cognitive function: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this scoping review was to map and synthesize empirical evidence on the relationship between esports participation and cognitive function, with particular attention to executive control, attentional processes, visuospatial working memory, decision-making, and lifestyle-related factors. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Web of Science following PRISMA-ScR guidance. Nine empirical studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. The included evidence consisted mainly of cross-sectional comparisons, together with a small number of intervention, acute experimental, and qualitative studies. The studies were organized into three thematic domains: cognitive differences across expertise levels, lifestyle and intervention effects on cognitive performance, and decision-making or training mechanisms. Five studies primarily examined expertise-level differences, three addressed lifestyle, health load, or intervention-related factors, and one focused on decision-making and training processes. Overall, the available evidence suggests that competitive esports players may show advantages in selected cognitive domains, particularly executive control, attentional flexibility, and visuospatial processing. However, findings were heterogeneous across game genres, participant classifications, cognitive tasks, and reporting practices. Because only nine studies were eligible and most designs were cross-sectional, the current evidence base remains insufficient for strong causal conclusions about whether esports participation improves cognitive function or whether pre-existing cognitive abilities contribute to esports expertise. Future research should use longitudinal, experimental, and cross-cultural designs with standardized cognitive measures and transparent reporting of statistical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.