Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42430395›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The relationship between esports and cognitive function: A scoping review.

Mingyang Lu, Hwanho Lee, Inae Yoon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingyang LuDepartment of Physical Education, Dankook University, Yongin, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7012-1278
Hwanho LeeDepartment of Physical Education, Dankook University, Yongin, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6465-4366
Inae YoonGraduate School of Education (Department of Education), Dankook University, Yongin-si, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9145-9969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this scoping review was to map and synthesize empirical evidence on the relationship between esports participation and cognitive function, with particular attention to executive control, attentional processes, visuospatial working memory, decision-making, and lifestyle-related factors. Searches were conducted in PubMed and Web of Science following PRISMA-ScR guidance. Nine empirical studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis. The included evidence consisted mainly of cross-sectional comparisons, together with a small number of intervention, acute experimental, and qualitative studies. The studies were organized into three thematic domains: cognitive differences across expertise levels, lifestyle and intervention effects on cognitive performance, and decision-making or training mechanisms. Five studies primarily examined expertise-level differences, three addressed lifestyle, health load, or intervention-related factors, and one focused on decision-making and training processes. Overall, the available evidence suggests that competitive esports players may show advantages in selected cognitive domains, particularly executive control, attentional flexibility, and visuospatial processing. However, findings were heterogeneous across game genres, participant classifications, cognitive tasks, and reporting practices. Because only nine studies were eligible and most designs were cross-sectional, the current evidence base remains insufficient for strong causal conclusions about whether esports participation improves cognitive function or whether pre-existing cognitive abilities contribute to esports expertise. Future research should use longitudinal, experimental, and cross-cultural designs with standardized cognitive measures and transparent reporting of statistical results.

Indexed as

CognitionAttentionDecision MakingExecutive FunctionHumansMemory, Short-Term

Identifiers

PMID42430395
PMCPMC13353933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.